Modern Technology and the Use of Electronics Essay

innovational technology and the accustom of electronics, especially computers let changed drastically over the last century. slice many smell out that there is a major advantage for the frequent ingestion of computers, especially for the youth there atomic number 18 some who oppose the incessant utilise of them and feel as though they ass be a bit of a downfall to the learning process overall. time we may all score our private opinions on how computers impact the youth on writing and also reading.Clive Thompson and David Gelernter, who are both(prenominal) actors have inviolate opinions on how computers fix students. While Clive feels as though the use of computers encourage the youth to read and salvage much David does non agree with the constant use of technology. Both authors have shuffle very strong and valid points on the topic. Clive Thompson, who is a intuition and technology generator for the New York Times Magazine feels that since computers, textual matter messaging and different social sites have come available to everyone, it offers kids the opportunity to create verbally more than.In this generation kids are forever texting one a nonher and engaging in various social networks, compared to older generations who simply wrote when it was required for them to do so. He makes points by explaining that social media and status updates encourages kids to write more to their audience explaining their daily tweets and online blogs. On this topic, Thompson discusses a smoke of research by prof Andrea Lunsford and finds himself agreeing with her studies stating that, I think were in midst of a literacy revolution the likes of which we harbourt seen since Greek civilization, she says.A lot of socializing starts online and sometimes involves texting, status updates and blogging. Its giving the young people the talent to express themselves more through their writing, where they effortlessly communicate back and forth with their pee rs. Clive Thompson makes a great point by explaining how computers notion the young generation into writing to their peers and not just their professor for an assignment. In conclusion, he agrees with Lunsford, stating that, Technology isnt illing our ability to write. Its reviving it and pushing our literacy in courageous new directions. David Gelernter, who received his undergraduate storey from Yale University in classical Hebrew literature and is a professor of computer science at Yale feels exactly the opposite. Unlike Thompson, he feels that computers should be in the schools and could economic aid achieve great things in subjects that he feel are being neglected as art and music.The difference is that Gelernter feels as though, Computers make our worst educational nightmares come true, he says. He makes a point on how the software on computers computes auto-spelling and also arithmetic. He explains that multimedia blinded students from the fundamentals of rattling rea ding a book, and understanding what the author is conveying to the audience. David explains his theory on his conditions on how a computer should be used. source he states that there should be a new software for squirtren that ignites the childs imagination to get them to become more involved. Second, he wants to limit the use of computers for notwithstanding recess and relaxation periods, for the purpose of kids not becoming dependent on it. most important, he feels like educators should learn what parents and teachers already know you cannot teach a child anything unless you look him in the face. The computers likely to do good is modestly greater than a books in some areas. Its potential to do harm is vastly greater, across the board. The two authors have stated strong opinions about their beliefs on computers, and how they affect the younger generation. The similarities the share, is that computers do offer different opportunities to help them both academically and sociall y, but we should not ignore that the basics is what students need to be successful and not a concisely cut.